Role of Duodenal Bulb Biopsy in Diagnosing Suspected Celiac Disease in Adult Patients

Author:

Deb Anasua1,Moond Vishali2,Thongtan Thanita3,Deliwala Smit4,Chandan Saurabh5,Mohan Babu P.6,Adler Douglas G.7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ

3. Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX

4. Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

5. Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE

6. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Utah Health School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT

7. Director, Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Centura Health, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, CO

Abstract

Background and Aims: Current guidelines recommend multiple biopsies from the first (D1) and second (D2) part of duodenum to establish a diagnosis of celiac disease. In this meta-analysis we aimed to find whether D1 biopsy can increase the diagnostic yield of adult celiac disease. Methods: Literature databases were searched until January 2023 for studies reporting diagnosis of celiac disease in the adult population using D1 biopsy. Meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2% and 95% prediction interval statistics. Measured outcomes were diagnostic yield with D1 and D2 biopsies and from 4 versus 2 biopsy samples. Results: A total of 16 studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled diagnostic rate of celiac disease from D1 biopsy was 77.4% [95% CI (64.7-86.5, I2 94%)] and from D2 biopsy was 75.3% [60.8-85.7, I2 96%]. The pooled rate of increase in diagnostic yield with D1 biopsy was 6.9% I [4.6-10.2, I2 66%]. The pooled diagnosis rate with 2 biopsy samples were 77.3% [50-92, I2 93%] and 86.4% I [58.4-96.7, I2 87%] from D1 and D2 respectively, whereas that with 4 biopsy samples were 83.3% [49.8-96.2, I2 76%] and 70.5% I [51-84.6, I2 96%] from D1 and D2, respectively, the difference being non-significant. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that taking 4 biopsy samples does not incur any additional diagnostic value over taking 2 biopsy samples from each duodenum segment. Although biopsy from the D1 and D2 has similar diagnostic yield in the adult population, there was an overall increase in diagnostic yield with D1 biopsy, especially in those with a patchy disease distribution.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Gastroenterology

Reference42 articles.

1. The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms;Ludvigsson;Gut,2013

2. Coeliac disease;Catassi;Lancet (London, England),2022

3. Incidence of celiac disease is increasing over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis;King;Am J Gastroenterol,2020

4. Global prevalence of celiac disease: systematic review and meta-analysis;Singh;Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc,2018

5. The Overlap between Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: A Clinical Dilemma;Makharia;Nutrients,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3