Esophageal Lichen Planus

Author:

Aby Elizabeth S.1,Eckmann Jason D.1,Abimansour Jad2,Katzka David A.2,Beveridge Claire3,Triggs Joseph R.3,Dbouk Mohamad4,Abdi Tsion4,Turner Kevin O.5,Antunes Catiele6,Zhuo Justin7,Kamal Afrin N.7,Patel Parth8,Gyawali C. Prakash8,Sloan Joshua A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition

2. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

3. Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

4. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

5. Department of Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

6. Division of Digestive Disease and Nutrition, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK

7. Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

8. Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

Abstract

Goals: To better understand the characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes of patients with esophageal lichen planus (ELP). Background: ELP is a rare, often unrecognized and misdiagnosed disorder. Data on this unique patient population are currently limited to small, single-center series. Study: A multicenter, retrospective descriptive study was conducted of adults diagnosed with ELP over a 5-year period, between January 1, 2015, and October 10, 2020, from 7 centers across the United States. Results: Seventy-eight patients (average age 65 y, 86% female, 90% Caucasian) were included. Over half had at least 1 extraesophageal manifestation. Esophageal strictures (54%) and abnormal mucosa (50%) were frequent endoscopic findings, with the proximal esophagus the most common site of stricture. Approximately 20% had normal endoscopic findings. Topical steroids (64%) and/or proton pump inhibitors (74%) dominated management; endoscopic response favored steroids (43% vs. 29% respectively). Almost half of the patients required switching treatment modalities during the study period. Adjunctive therapies varied significantly between centers. Conclusions: Given its at times subtle clinical and endoscopic signs, a high index of suspicion and biopsy will improve ELP diagnosis, especially in those with extraesophageal manifestations. Effective therapies are lacking and vary significantly. Prospective investigations into optimal treatment regimens are necessary.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Gastroenterology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3