Diagnostic Accuracy of Smartphone Corneal Photography for Detection of Corneal Opacities in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Community-Based Study

Author:

Cao Binh1ORCID,Giri Puspa2,Byanju Raghunandan2,Pradhan Sangita2,Bhandari Gopal2,Bhandari Sadhan2,Kandel Ram Prasad3,Poudyal Bimal2,Gonzales John A.14,Srinivasan Muthiah5,Upadhyay Madan6,Whitcher John P.14,O'Brien Kieran S.147,Lietman Thomas M.1478,Keenan Jeremy D.14

Affiliation:

1. Francis I Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA;

2. Bharatpur Eye Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal;

3. Seva Foundation, Berkeley, CA;

4. Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, CA;

5. Department of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India;

6. BP Eye Foundation, Children's Hospital for Eye, Ear, and Rehabilitation Services (CHEERS), Kathmandu, Nepal;

7. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and

8. Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of smartphone corneal photography in detecting corneal opacities in a community-based setting. Methods: A case-control, diagnostic accuracy study was nested in a cluster-randomized trial of a corneal ulcer prevention intervention in Nepal. Smartphone corneal photography was performed annually on community members self-reporting a potential risk factor for a corneal infection. Corneal photographs were graded for the presence or absence of an opacity. All cases with an opacity on smartphone photography and an equal number of controls were invited for a comprehensive eye examination with a slit lamp biomicroscope at an eye hospital. A mobile team visited participants unable to come to the hospital, conducting a limited examination with a penlight. Results: Of 1332 study participants (666 cases and 666 controls), 1097 had a penlight examination (535 cases and 562 controls) and 191 had a slit lamp examination (120 cases and 71 controls). When penlight examination was considered the reference standard, smartphone diagnosis of a corneal opacity had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 47% (95% confidence interval 43%–52%) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 95% (93%–97%). When slit lamp examination was considered the reference standard, the overall PPV and NPV were 71% (62%–78%) and 80% (70%–88%), respectively. The NPV was greater for detection of opacities >1 mm, estimated at 95% (90%–98%). Conclusions: Corneal photography performed in a resource-limited community-based setting using a smartphone coupled to an external attachment had acceptable diagnostic accuracy for detection of corneal opacities large enough to be clinically meaningful.

Funder

Fogarty International Center

National Eye Institute

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3