Abstract
Objective
The aim of the study is to compare work disability duration of intraprovincially and interprovincially mobile workers with nonmobile workers in British Columbia, Canada.
Methods
Workers’ compensation claims were extracted for workers injured between 2010 and 2019. Employer and residential postal codes were converted to economic regions to define nonmobile, intraprovincially, and interprovincially mobile workers. Quantile regression models using matched cohorts were used to estimate differences in work disability days at different percentiles of the distribution.
Results
Compared with nonmobile workers, both mobile worker groups had longer work disability durations, particularly interprovincially mobile workers. Differences persisted in injury-stratified models and were partially or fully attenuated in some industry-stratified models.
Conclusions
Workers’ compensation systems, employers, and healthcare providers may need to tailor specific interventions for mobile workers who are from out-of-province as well as traveling between regions in the province.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference20 articles.
1. Towards a feminist political economy framework for analyzing employment-related geographical mobility;Stud Polit Econ,2015
2. Occupational health and safety and the mobile workforce: insights from a Canadian research program;New Solut,2019
3. Differences in work disability duration for immigrants and Canadian-born workers in British Columbia, Canada;Int J Environ Res Public Health,2021
4. Immigrant status, gender and work disability duration: findings from a linked, retrospective cohort of workers’ compensation and immigration data from British Columbia, Canada;BMJ Open,2021
5. Total disability days in interprovincial and home-province workers injured in Alberta, Canada: a mixed-methods study with matched-pair analysis of compensation data and participant interviews;Am J Ind Med,2020