Author:
Tsukahara Keita,Ishimaru Tomohiro,Matsugaki Ryutaro,Ando Hajime,Mafune Kosuke,Nagata Tomohisa,Tateishi Seiichiro,Tsuji Mayumi,Kataoka Masaharu,Fujino Yoshihisa,
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to identify the COVID-19 infection prevention measures that are at risk of being perceived by employees as mistreatment in the workplace.
Methods
This study included full-time workers who enrolled as subjects in a nationwide prospective cohort study. Baseline surveys performed during the pandemic were used to identify the workplace measures against COVID-19. A tracing survey was conducted 1 year later to assess workplace mistreatment.
Results
Of the 18,170 participants, 276 judged that they had experienced mistreatment by the measures. “Enforcing daily temperature measurement” and “stopping business trips” were associated with mistreatment. Meanwhile, “requesting that employees refrain from going to work when ill” and “restricting work-related social gatherings and entertainment” had the potential to reduce workplace mistreatment.
Conclusions
Certain measures against COVID-19 can reduce or increase the burden on employees.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health