Abstract
Objectives
The objectives are to compare lead blood concentrations in veterinary workers using lead shielding with concentrations in a control population, to measure hand surface lead before and after use of shielding, and to compare hand surface lead with and without the use of disposable gloves worn under hand shielding.
Methods
Blood and hand wipe samples were analyzed for lead using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.
Results
There was no difference in blood lead between exposed and control groups. After lead glove use, 69% (18/26) of hand surface lead samples from workers not using disposable gloves were greater than 500 μg, 42% (11/26) were greater than 1000 μg, and 12% (3/26) were greater than 2000 μg.
Conclusions
If lead shielding use is unavoidable, disposable gloves should be worn, and skin should be decontaminated after use.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference11 articles.
1. Lead aprons are a lead exposure hazard;J Am Coll Radiol,2017
2. Lead poisoning risk assessment of radiology workers using lead shields;Arch Environ Occup Health,2020
3. Occupational health hazards in veterinary medicine: physical, psychological, and chemical hazards;Can Vet J,2012
4. Prevalence of hazardous exposures in veterinary practice;Am J Ind Med,1989
5. A prospective-controlled study of pregnant veterinary staff exposed to inhaled anesthetics and x-rays;Int J Occup Med Environ Health,2002