Applicability of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Aesthetic Medicine Patient Archetypes

Author:

Rauch Simonne1,De Simone Patricia2,Bertucci Vince34

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Life Science, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Canada; Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Woodbridge, Ontario Canada;

2. Aesthetic Medicine Network Inc. (AMNI), Toronto, Ontario Canada;

3. Private Practice, Woodbridge, Ontario, Canada

4. Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada

Abstract

BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable in understanding patient motivations, setting expectations, and ensuring satisfaction. As the aesthetic industry expands globally, factors that motivate the treatment goals of the aesthetic patient reflect evolving social, cultural, and commercial influences. OBJECTIVE This article will assess the applicability of current PROMs used in aesthetic medicine to an increasingly diverse patient population and consider their ability to measure the underlying motives that drive different types of patients to pursue their specific goals. METHODS PubMed database was searched for studies using PROMs to evaluate the motivations and expectations of aesthetic patients. RESULTS Seven validated aesthetic PROM tools were reviewed against a backdrop of different patient segments as represented by the 4 patient archetypes: Positive Aging, Beautification, Correction, and Transformation. None of the tools could universally represent the individual motivations and expectations of all 4 patient archetypes. CONCLUSION There is a need for updated PROMs in aesthetics that are applicable to patients with different motivations or expected outcomes than the traditional rejuvenation patient. PROMs that help decode patient motivations and that are developed with more diverse patient involvement will help aesthetic clinicians better understand the goals and expectations of new patient segments.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Dermatology,General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3