Use of Imaging in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma to Detect High-Risk Tumor Features, Nodal Metastasis, and Distant Metastasis: A Systematic Review

Author:

Libson Karissa1,Sheridan Connor2,Carr David R.3,Shahwan Kathryn T.234

Affiliation:

1. The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio;

2. University of North Dakota Medical School, Grand Forks, North Dakota;

3. Department of Dermatology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio;

4. Department of Dermatology, Altru Health System, Grand Forks, North Dakota

Abstract

BACKGROUND Imaging has been shown to impact management and disease outcomes in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, but the literature on optimal modalities is lacking. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review evaluating the performance of various imaging studies for the detection of perineural spread, bony invasion, nodal metastasis (NM), and distant metastasis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four databases were searched for relevant terms. Articles were included if they presented primary data on 5 or more subjects with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma who underwent imaging to detect perineural spread, bony involvement, NM, or distant metastasis. RESULTS Thirty studies and 1,027 subjects were included in the pooled analysis. Magnetic resonance imaging had a 94.9% sensitivity in detecting perineural spread. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a sensitivity of 75.7% and specificity of 98.6% in detecting bony invasion. While ultrasound, positron emission tomography–computed tomography, and CT all performed reasonably well in detecting NM, CT demonstrated the highest sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (100%). Imaging changed management in up to 33% of cases. CONCLUSION Imaging is useful in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Magnetic resonance imaging performs best in the detection of perineural spread, and CT is the most accurate modality to detect bony invasion and NM.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3