The Differences in the Practice of Cosmetic Dermatologic Procedures Between Physicians and Nonphysicians

Author:

Aleisa Abdullah1,Lu Jasmine Thai2,Al Saud Aljohara3,Veldhuizen Inge J.4,Rossi Anthony M.5,Lee Kachiu C.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia;

2. Drexel University College of Medicine, University of California, Irvine;

3. College of Medicine, AlFaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia;

4. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands;

5. Dermatology Division, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;

6. Main Line Center for Laser Surgery, Ardmore, Pennsylvania

Abstract

BACKGROUND With a rise in demand for cosmetic dermatologic procedures comes an increase in nonphysician providers performing such procedures. However, little is known about the practice of cosmetic procedures performed by nonphysicians. OBJECTIVE To assess the differences in the practice of cosmetic procedures provided by physicians and nonphysicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional analysis was performed using participant (n = 4,062) responses to an 18-point, web-based survey about previous cosmetic procedures. RESULTS In total, 1,328 participants reported having previous cosmetic procedures done by a physician (n = 828), a nonphysician (n = 413), or an unknown provider (n = 87). Respondents of all age ranges and male respondents (p < .001) tended to choose physicians over nonphysician providers when choosing a practice. Moderate adverse events were more frequently seen when nonphysician providers completed cosmetic procedures (p < .001). Despite a higher frequency (73.3% vs 51.8%) of more moderate complications seen in procedures done by nonphysician providers, over 70% of respondents believe that nonphysician providers are qualified enough to continue performing cosmetic procedures. CONCLUSION People should be encouraged to make an informed decision when choosing a provider because cosmetic procedures are still considered medical procedures.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Dermatology,General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3