Hypertension in the first blood pressure reading and the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in the general population: findings from the prospective KORA study

Author:

Atasoy Seryan12,Henningsen Peter1,Johar Hamimatunnisa23,Middeke Martin4,Sattel Heribert1,Linkohr Birgit56,Rückert-Eheberg Ina-Maria5,Heier Margit57,Peters Annette568,Ladwig Karl-Heinz169

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

2. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Giessen and Marburg, Germany

3. Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia

4. Hypertension Center Munich, a European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Center of Excellence, Munich, Germany

5. Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich – German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany

6. Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Partnersite Munich

7. Kora Study Centre, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

8. Chair of Epidemiology, Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany

9. Hypertension Center Munich, a European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Center of Excellence

Abstract

Background: The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in individuals with an alerting reaction, assessed by hypertension in the first blood pressure (BP) reading but normal BP in further readings, remains unknown in the general population. Methods and Results: In a sample of 11 146 adults (51.5% men and 48.5% women) with a mean age of 47.1 years (SD ± 12.3) from a German population-based cohort, we analyzed risk factors and CVD mortality risk associated with an alerting reaction. An alerting reaction was prevalent in 10.2% of the population and associated with sociodemographic, lifestyle, and somatic CVD risk factors. Within a mean follow-up period of 22.7 years (SD ± 7.05 years; max: 32 years; 253 201 person years), 1420 (12.7%) CVD mortality cases were observed. The CVD mortality rate associated with an alerting reaction was significantly higher than in normotension (64 vs. 32 cases/10 000 person-years), but lower than hypertension (118 cases/10 000 person-years). Correspondingly, the alerting reaction was associated with a 23% higher hazard ratio of CVD mortality than normal blood pressure [hazard ratio 1.23 (95% confidence interval 1.02–1.49), P = 0.04]. However, adjustment for antihypertensive medication use attenuated this association [1.19 (0.99–1.44), P = 0.06]. Conclusion: The results may warrant monitoring of an alerting reaction as a preventive measure of CVD mortality in untreated individuals with elevated first BP readings, as well as optimized treatment in treated individuals.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Physiology,Internal Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines;Whelton;J Am Coll Cardiol,2018

2. Diagnosis and management of hypertension in adults: NICE guideline update 2019;Jones;Br J Gen Pract,2020

3. 2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension Endorsed by the European Renal Association (ERA) and the International Society of Hypertension (ISH);Mancia;J Hypertens,2023

4. 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines;Unger;Hypertension,2020

5. 2021 European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for office and out-of-office blood pressure measurement;Stergiou;J Hypertens,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3