Quality and Outcome Assessment for Surgery-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Quality and Outcome Assessment for Surgery

Published:2023-08-09 Issue:5 Volume:278 Page:647-654
ISSN:0003-4932
Container-title:Annals of Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Chiche Laurence¹,Yang Han-Kwang²,Abbassi Fariba³,Robles-Campos Ricardo⁴,Stain Steven C.⁵,Ko Clifford Y.⁶,Neumayer Leigh A.⁷,Pawlik Timothy M.⁸,Barkun Jeffrey S.⁹,Clavien Pierre-Alain³

Affiliation:

1. University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

2. Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

3. University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

4. Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University Hospital IMIB, Murcia, Spain

5. Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA

6. University of California at Los Angeles and the American College of Surgeons, Los Angeles, CA

7. University of Florida, College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL

8. The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH

9. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

Abstract

Abstract: This forum summarizes the proceedings of the joint European Surgical Association (ESA)/American Surgical Association (ASA) symposium on Quality and Outcome Assessment for Surgery that took place in Bordeaux, France, as part of the celebrations of the 30th anniversary of the ESA. Three presentations focused on a) the main messages from the Outcome4Medicine Consensus Conference, which took place in Zurich, Switzerland, in June 2022, b) the patient perspective, and c) benchmarking were hold by ESA members and discussed by ASA members in a symposium attended by members of both associations.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

Reference63 articles.

1. Consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions;Domenghino;Nat Med,2023

2. Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers;Horton;Lancet,1996

3. Biased reporting in surgery;Clavien;Br J Surg,2014

4. An independent jury-based consensus conference model for the development of recommendations in medico-surgical practice;Lesurtel;Surgery,2014

5. A comparison of clinical registry versus administrative claims data for reporting of 30-day surgical complications;Lawson;Ann Surg,2012

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How to measure quality of surgery as a component of multimodality treatment of gastric cancer;Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery;2024-06-12

2. Proximal gastric cancer—time for organ-sparing approach?;Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery;2024-06

3. Textbook Neoadjuvant Outcome—Novel Composite Measure of Oncological Outcomes among Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Multimodal Treatment;Cancers;2024-04-28

4. Surgical Outcome Reporting. Moving from a Comic to a Tragic Opera?;Annals of Surgery;2024-02-07