Impact of the Surgical Approach for Neoadjuvantly Treated Gastroesophageal Junction Type II Tumors

Author:

Wirsik Naita M.1,Schmidt Thomas1,Nienhüser Henrik2,Donlon Noel E.34,de Jongh Cas5,Uzun Eren6,Fuchs Hans F.1,Brunner Stefanie1,Alakus Hakan1,Hölscher Arnulf H.7,Grimminger Peter6,Schneider Martin2,Reynolds John V.34,van Hillegersberg Richard5,Bruns Christiane J.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

2. Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

3. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

4. Trinity St James’ Cancer Institute, St James’s Hospital Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

5. Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

6. Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany

7. Contilia Center for Esophageal Diseases, Elisabeth Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore oncologic outcomes of transhiatal gastrectomy (THG) or transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) for neoadjuvantly treated gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) Siewert type II adenocarcinomas, a multinational, high-volume center cohort analysis was undertaken. Background: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) followed by surgery is the standard therapy for locally advanced GEJ. However, the optimal surgical approach for type II GEJ tumors remains unclear, as the decision is mainly based on individual experience and assessment of operative risk. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 5 prospectively maintained databases was conducted. Between 2012 and 2021, 800 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria for type II GEJ tumors and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or CTx. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS). Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. Results: Patients undergoing THG (n=163, 20.4%) had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification and cT stage (P<0.001) than patients undergoing TTE (n=637, 79.6%). Neoadjuvant therapy was different as the THG group were mainly undergoing CTx (87.1%, P<0.001). The TTE group showed higher tumor regression (P=0.009), lower ypT/ypM categories (both P<0.001), higher nodal yield (P=0.009) and higher R0 resection rate (P=0.001). The mOS after TTE was longer (78.0 vs 40.0 months, P=0.013). After propensity score matching a higher R0 resection rate (P=0.004) and mOS benefit after TTE remained (P=0.04). Subgroup analyses of patients without distant metastasis (P=0.037) and patients only after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.021) confirmed the survival benefit of TTE. TTE was an independent predictor of longer survival. Conclusion: Awaiting results of the randomized CARDIA trial, TTE should in high-volume centers be considered the preferred approach due to favorable oncologic outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3