The Blue Ribbon Committee II Report and Recommendations on Surgical Education and Training in the United States: 2024

Author:

Stain Steven C.1,Ellison E. Christopher2,Farmer Diana L.3,Flynn Timothy C.4,Freischlag Julie A.5,Matthews Jeffrey B.6,Newman Rachel W.7,Chen Xiaodong2,Stefanidis Dimitrios8,Britt L.D.9,Buyske Jo10,Fisher Karen11,Sachdeva Ajit K.7,Turner Patricia L.7,

Affiliation:

1. Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA

2. The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH

3. The University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA

4. University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL

5. Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC

6. The University of Chicago Medicine & Biological Sciences, Chicago, IL

7. The American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL

8. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN

9. Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA

10. American Board of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA

11. Public Member, Washington, DC

Abstract

Objective: An expert panel made recommendations to optimize surgical education and training based on the effects of contemporary challenges. Background: The inaugural Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC I) proposed sweeping recommendations for surgical education and training in 2004. In light of those findings, a second BRC (BRC II) was convened to make recommendations to optimize surgical training considering the current landscape in medical education. Methods: BRC II was a panel of 67 experts selected on the basis of experience and leadership in surgical education and training. It was organized into subcommittees which met virtually over the course of a year. They developed recommendations, along with the Steering Committee, based on areas of focus and then presented them to the entire BRC II. The Delphi method was chosen to obtain consensus, defined as ≥80% agreement among the panel. Cronbach α was computed to assess the internal consistency of 3 Delphi rounds. Results: Of the 50 recommendations, 31 obtained consensus in the following aspects of surgical training (# of consensus recommendation/# of proposed): Workforce (1/5); Medical Student Education (3/8); Work Life Integration (4/6); Resident Education (5/7); Goals, Structure, and Financing of Training (5/8); Education Support and Faculty Development (5/6); Research Training (7/9); and Educational Technology and Assessment (1/1). The internal consistency was good in Rounds 1 and 2 and acceptable in Round 3. Conclusions: BRC II used the Delphi approach to identify and recommend 31 priorities for surgical education in 2024. We advise establishing a multidisciplinary surgical educational group to oversee, monitor, and facilitate implementation of these recommendations.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference14 articles.

1. Surgery: a noble profession in a changing world;Debas;Ann Surg,2002

2. American Surgical Association Blue Ribbon Committee Report on Surgical Education: 2004;Debas;Ann Surg,2005

3. Issues in general surgery residency training—2012;Lewis;Ann Surg,2012

4. Not otherwise specified: the quiet revolution in medical training;Rosenbaum;N Engl J Med,2024

5. Delivering on the promise of competency based medical education—an institutional approach;Dagnone;Can Med Educ J,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3