Clinical Interpretation of Word-Recognition Scores for Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Confidence Intervals, Limits, and Levels

Author:

Margolis Robert H.12,Wilson Richard H.2,Saly George L.1

Affiliation:

1. Audiology Incorporated, Arden Hills, Minnesota, USA

2. Arizona State University, Speech and Hearing Science College of Health Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA.

Abstract

Objectives: Confidence levels were established to determine if a word-recognition score is within the expected range for a hearing loss group (based on 3-frequency pure-tone average) or significantly below or above the expected range. Design: Two large clinical databases were mined to produce data-sets composed of word-recognition scores obtained with Q/MASS NU-6 materials and VA NU-6 materials for patients with average hearing losses ranging from 0 to 70 dB HL. Percentiles representing scores that are below (2.5%, 5%, and 10%) and above (90%, 95%, and 97.5%) the expected range (defined as the 80% confidence interval) were established. To estimate the distribution of scores and percentiles for the Auditec NU-6 materials (for which a large database is not available) Q/MASS scores were transformed to Auditec scores based on published psychometric functions. Results: The resulting confidence levels and expected ranges of word-recognition scores should be useful for interpreting the relationship between a score and the distribution of scores for the patient’s hearing loss severity. Confidence levels are described as low, moderate, and high corresponding to the statistical level of assurance that a score is lower or higher than the expected score. Conclusions: The confidence levels and expected ranges may be helpful for interpreting word-recognition scores obtained with three widely used sets of NU-6 test materials.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Otorhinolaryngology

Reference17 articles.

1. Audiology clinical practice algorithms and statements.;Audiology Today,2015

2. Discrimination test word difficulty.;Campbell;J Speech Hear Res,1965

3. A comparative evaluation of the Maryland NU 6 Auditory Test.;Causey;J Speech Hear Disord,1983

4. Confidence limits for maximum word-recognition scores.;Dubno;J Speech Hear Res,1995

5. A comparison of presentation levels to maximize word recognition performance.;Guthrie;J Am Acad Audiol,2009

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3