Treatment for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis without antibiotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Author:

Correa Bonito Alba1ORCID,Cerdán Santacruz Carlos1ORCID,Di Martino Marcello2ORCID,Blanco Terés Lara3,Gancedo Quintana Álvaro3ORCID,Martín-Pérez Elena3ORCID,Biondo Sebastiano4ORCID,García Septiem Javier1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Colorectal Surgery Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Service

2. Ospedale Cardarelli, A.O.R.N, HBP Department, Napoli, Campania, Italy

3. General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid

4. General and Digestive Surgery – Colorectal Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Background: Use of antibiotics in selected cases of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) has recently been questioned. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of treatment regimens without antibiotics compared with that of traditional treatments with antibiotics in selected patients with AUD. Data sources: PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library Methods: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines by searching through Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published before December 2022. The outcomes assessed were the rates of readmission, change in strategy, emergency surgery, worsening, and persistent diverticulitis. Study selection: RCTs on treating AUD without antibiotics published in English before December 2022 were included. Intervention: Treatments without antibiotics were compared with treatments with antibiotics. Main outcome measures: The outcomes assessed were the rates of readmission, change in strategy, emergency surgery, worsening, and persistent diverticulitis. Results: The search yielded 1163 studies. Four RCTs with 1809 patients were included in the review. Among these patients, 50.1% were treated conservatively without antibiotics. The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between nonantibiotic and antibiotic treatment groups with respect to rates of readmission [odds ratio (OR)=1.39; 95% CI: 0.93–2.06; P=0.11; I 2=0%], change in strategy (OR=1.03; 95% CI: 0.52–2,02; P=0.94; I 2=44%), emergency surgery (OR=0.43; 95% CI: 0.12–1.53; P=0.19; I 2=0%), worsening (OR=0.91; 95% CI: 0.48–1.73; P=0.78; I 2=0%), and persistent diverticulitis (OR=1.54; 95% CI: 0.63–3.26; P=0.26; I 2=0%). Limitations: Heterogeneity and a limited number of RCTs. Conclusions: Treatment for AUD without antibiotic therapy is safe and effective in selected patients. Further RTCs should confirm the present findings.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3