Comparison of safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction with thermal ablation versus endoscopic thyroidectomy for benign thyroid nodules in a propensity-matched cohort

Abstract

Background: Thyroid nodules (TNs) often require intervention due to symptomatic or cosmetic concerns. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has shown promise as a treatment option, offering potential advantages without neck scars. Recently, the scarless treatment alternative of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) has emerged. When surgery can be performed in a scarless manner, it remains unclear whether ablation is still the preferred treatment choice. This study aims to compare the safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction of RFA and TOETVA. Study Design: A retrospective data analysis was conducted on patients treated with RFA or TOETVA for unilateral benign TNs between December 2016 and September 2021. Propensity score matching was employed to create comparable groups. Various clinicopathologic parameters, treatment outcomes, and costs were assessed. Results: Of the 2,814 nonfunctional thyroid nodules treated during this period, 642 were benign and unilateral. A total of 121 and 100 patients underwent thermal ablation and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy, respectively. After matching, 84 patients were selected for each group. Both RFA and TOETVA demonstrated low complication rates, with unique complications associated with each procedure. Treatment time (30.8±13.6 minutes vs. 120.7±36.5 minutes, P<0.0001) was shorter in the RFA group. Patient satisfaction (significant improvement: 89.3% vs. 61.9%, P<0.0001) and cosmetic results (cosmetic score 1-2: 100.0% vs. 54.76%, P<0.0001) favored TOETVA. RFA was found to be less costly for a single treatment, but the cost of retreatment should be considered. The histological diagnoses post-TOETVA revealed malignancies in 9 out of 84 cases, underscoring the significance of follow-up assessments. Conclusion: Scarless procedures, RFA and TOETVA, are effective for treating unilateral benign TNs, each with unique advantages and drawbacks. While RFA is cheaper for a single treatment, TOETVA offers superior cosmetic results and patient satisfaction. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term safety and cost-effectiveness. It is crucial to remain vigilant about the possibility of malignancy despite benign cytology pre-treatment.