Nationwide analysis of prehospital tranexamic acid for trauma demonstrates systematic bias in adherence to treatment guidelines: a retrospective cohort study

Author:

Almuwallad Ateeq12,Cole Elaine1,Rossetto Andrea13,Brohi Karim13,Perkins Zane13,Davenport Ross13

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London

2. Emergency Medical Services Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

3. Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK

Abstract

Background: Prehospital (PH) tranexamic acid (TXA) improves survival from trauma haemorrhage. Injury mechanism, physiology, and sex demographics vary with patient age. The authors hypothesised that these factors influence TXA guideline compliance and examined national trends in PH use to identify any systematic biases in bleeding management. Materials and methods: The UK Trauma Audit and Research Network data for TXA eligible patients admitted to major trauma centres were divided into two cohorts: 2013–2015 (n=32 072) and 2017–2019 (n=14 974). Patients were stratified by PH, emergency department or no TXA use. Logistic regression models explored interaction between PH variables and TXA administration. Results are presented as odds ratios with a 95% CI. Results: PH TXA use increased from 8% to 27% over time (P<0.001). Only 3% of eligible patients who fell less than 2 m received PH TXA versus 63% with penetrating injuries (P<0.001). Older patients eligible for PH TXA were less likely to receive it compared to younger patients [≥65 years old: 590 (13%) vs. <65 years old: 3361 (33%), P<0.001]. There was a significant interaction between age and sex with fewer older women receiving PH TXA. In shocked patients, one third of females compared to a fifth of men did not receive TXA (P<0.001). There was a decrease in PH TXA use as age increased (P<0.001). Conclusions: Despite a threefold increase in use, treatment guidance for PH TXA is not universally applied. Older people, women, and patients with low energy injury mechanisms appear to be systematically under treated. Training and education for PH providers should address these potential treatment biases.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3