Effect of regional versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study

Author:

Kline Leigh A.1,Kothandaraman Venkatraman2,Knio Ziyad O.1ORCID,Zuo Zhiyi1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Health

2. School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Abstract

Background: The effect of regional versus general anesthesia on carotid endarterectomy outcomes is debated. This study assesses the effect of anesthetic technique on major morbidity and mortality and additional secondary endpoints following carotid endarterectomy. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective propensity-matched-cohort analysis investigating elective carotid endarterectomy patients in the 2015–2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (n=37 204). The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and major morbidity, defined as stroke, myocardial infarction, or death. Secondary endpoints included minor morbidity, bleeding events, healthcare resource utilization, and length of hospital stay. Univariate, multivariable, and survival analyses were applied. Results: The 1 : 1 propensity-matched-cohort included 8304 patients (4152 in each group). Regional anesthesia was associated with similar incidences of major morbidity and mortality [odds ratio (OR), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.61–1.09); P = 0.162] and unplanned resource utilization [OR, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.78–1.11); P = 0.443], but lower incidences of minor morbidity [OR, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44–0.81); P < 0.001] and bleeding events [OR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30–0.78); P = 0.002], and a shorter length of hospital stay [1.4 vs. 1.6 days; mean difference, -0.16 days (95% CI, -0.25 to -0.07); P < 0.001]. On multivariable analysis, regional anesthesia remained independently predictive of minor morbidity [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.42–0.79); P = 0.001] and bleeding events [AOR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30–0.77); P = 0.003]. Significance was maintained on survival analysis for these two endpoints. A mortality benefit was observed on univariate [OR, 0.50 (95% CI, 0.25–1.00); P = 0.045], multivariable [AOR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.24–0.96); P = 0.043], and survival analysis (P = 0.045). Conclusions: Carotid endarterectomy patients receiving regional anesthesia experience favorable outcomes compared to propensity-matched general anesthesia controls.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

Reference34 articles.

1. Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy;Rerkasem;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2021

2. Prospective evaluation of electroencephalography, carotid artery stump pressure, and neurologic changes during 314 consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed in awake patients;Hans;J Vasc Surg,2007

3. General versus regional anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy;Unic-Stojanovic;J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth,2013

4. Anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy – general or loco-regional?;Zdrehuş;Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care,2015

5. Regional or general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: does it matter?;Licker;Eur J Anaesthesiol,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3