Cephalic inferior vena cava non-clamping technique versus standard procedure for robot-assisted laparoscopic level II–III thrombectomy: a prospective cohort study

Author:

Zhang Yu1,Bi Hai1,Fu YunJie2ORCID,Zhang HongXian1,Zhang ShuDong1,Liu Ke1,Liu Lei1,Li Nan3,Liu Cheng1,Tian XiaoJun1,Ma LuLin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology

2. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China

3. Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital

Abstract

Background: Renal tumour can invade the venous system and ~4–10% patients with renal tumour had venous thrombus. Although the feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic inferior vena cava thrombectomy (RAL-IVCT) in patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus has been validated, the wide application is still a challenge due to the complexity of IVC control. The objective was to describe our novel cephalic IVC non-clamping technique and to compare the outcomes versus standard RAL-IVCT. Materials and methods: A prospective single-centre cohort containing 30 patients with level II–III IVC thrombus was established since August 2020. Fifteen patients underwent cephalic IVC non-clamping approach and 15 patients received standard RAL-IVCT. The authors decided the surgical technique according to the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart and IVC. Results: The non-clamping group had less operative time (median 148 versus 185 min, P=0.04), and lower Clavien-grade II complication rate (26.7% versus 80.0%, P=0.003). The median intraoperative blood loss were 400 ml [interquartile range (IQR) 275–615 mL] and 800 ml (IQR 350–1300 ml), respectively (P=0.05). The most common complication in standard RAL-IVCT group was liver dysfunction. No gas embolism, hypercapnia or tumour thrombus dislodgment occurred in non-clamping group. After a median follow-up of 17.0 months (IQR 13.5–18.5 months) and 15.5 months (IQR 13.0–17.0 months), two patients (16.7%) in the non-clamping group and 3 patients (20.0%) in the standard RAL-IVCT group died (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.10–3.54, P=0.55). Conclusions: The cephalic IVC non-clamping technique can be performed safely with acceptable surgical outcomes and short-term oncologic outcomes in patients with level II–III IVC thrombus. Compared with standard procedure, it had less operative time and lower complication rate.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3