Learning curve in pipeline embolization device: results from the pipeline embolization device in China post-market multicentre registry study

Author:

Lu Junlin1ORCID,Zhao Yang23,Zhang Hongqi4,Li Tianxiao5,Song Donglei6,Guan Sheng7,Maimaitili Aisha8,Wang Yunyan9,Feng Wenfeng10,Wang Yang11,Wan Jieqing12,Mao Guohua13,Shi Huaizhang14,Yang Xinjian3,Liu Jianmin15,Zhao Yuanli3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan

2. Peking University International Hospital

3. Beijing Tiantan Hospital

4. Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing

5. Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital

6. Shanghai Donglei Brain Hospital

7. First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou

8. First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Uruqi

9. Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan

10. Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou

11. First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

12. Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

13. Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang

14. First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

15. Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai

Abstract

Background: Intracranial aneurysms pose a significant health issue, affecting 3–5% of the adult population. The pipeline embolization device (PED) has emerged as a promising treatment for these lesions. This study aimed to investigate the impact of operator experience on complication and poor outcome rates, as well as the learning curve for PED. Methods: A total of 217 patients were consecutively enroled from four eligible centres and divided into three groups based on the number of procedures performed: group 1 (first 10 procedures), group 2 (11–20 procedures), and group 3(>20 procedures). Major complications include operation-related ischaemic or haemorrhagic events and mass effect deterioration. Poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score greater than 2 at discharge. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis was generated to assess the learning curve according to major complications and poor outcome. Results: The study found that major complications and poor outcomes occurred in 5.1% and 2.3% of cases, respectively. The rate of major complications decreased from 10.0% in group 1 to 2.9% in group 3 (P=0.053), while the rate of poor outcomes decreased from 7.5% in group 1 to 0.7% in group 3 (P=0.015). Multivariable regression analysis adjusted for covariates showed that operator experience was associated with a lower rate of poor outcomes (P=0.034). CUSUM analysis demonstrated that the learning curve for avoiding major complications and poor outcomes required 27 (mean=13) and 40 (mean=20) cases, respectively. Conclusions: These findings suggest that PED treatment requires a learning curve of 40 cases to achieve reproducibility regarding complications and functional results. Additionally, major complications and poor outcomes significantly decreases after the first 20 procedures. CUSUM analysis can serve as a useful tool for monitoring and assessing surgical performance.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3