Long-term survival outcomes of robotic total gastrectomy for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer: a prospective study

Author:

Zhong Qing123,Tang Yi-Hui123,Liu Zhi-Yu123,Zhang Zhi-Quan123,He Qi-Chen123,Li Ping123,Xie Jian-Wei123,Wang Jia-Bin123,Lin Jian-Xian123,Lu Jun123,Chen Qi-Yue123,Zheng Chao-Hui123,Huang Chang-Ming123

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China

2. Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China

3. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

Abstract

Background: Robotic gastrectomy is a safe and feasible approach for gastric cancer (GC); however, its long-term oncological efficacy remains unclear. We evaluated the long-term survival outcomes and recurrence patterns of patients with locally advanced proximal GC who underwent robotic total gastrectomy (RTG). Methods: This prospective study (FUGES-014 study) enrolled 48 patients with locally advanced proximal GC who underwent RTG between March 2018 and February 2020 at a tertiary referral teaching hospital. Patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) in the FUGES-002 study were enrolled in a 2:1 ratio to compare the survival outcomes between RTG and LTG. The primary endpoint of the FUGES-014 study was postoperative 30-day morbidity and has been previously reported. Here we reported the results of 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), 3-year overall survival (OS), and recurrence patterns. Results: After propensity score matching, 48 patients in the RTG and 96 patients in the LTG groups were included. The 3-year DFS rates were 77.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 66.1–89.9%) for the RTG and 68.8% (95% CI 60.1–78.7%) for the LTG groups (P=0.261). The 3-year OS rates were not significantly different between the groups (85.4% vs. 74.0%, P=0.122). Recurrence occurred in nine patients (18.8%) in the RTG and 27 (28.1%) patients in the LTG groups (P=0.234). Recurrence patterns and causes of death were similar between the groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: The oncological outcome of RTG was non-inferior to that of LTG. Thus, RTG might be an alternative surgical treatment for locally advanced proximal GC.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3