Efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis

Author:

Gao Benjian12,Chen Jianfei12ORCID,Liu Yongfa12,Hu Shuai12,Wang Rui12,Peng Fangyi12,Fang Chen12,Gan Yu12,Su Song12,Han Yunwei3,Yang Xiaoli12,Li Bo12

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Surgery (Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery

2. Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Metabolic Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases Key Laboratory of Luzhou City, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan Province, China

3. Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), a multidisciplinary and multimodal perioperative care protocol, has been widely used in several surgical fields. However, the effect of this care protocol on patients receiving minimally invasive bariatric surgery remains unclear. This meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes of the ERAS protocol and standard care (SC) in patients who underwent minimally invasive bariatric surgery. Material and methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify literature reporting the effects of the ERAS protocol on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive bariatric surgery. All the articles published until 01 October 2022, were searched, followed by data extraction of the included literature and independent quality assessment. Then, pooled mean difference (MD) and odds ratio with a 95% CI were calculated by either a random-effects or fixed-effects model. Results: Overall, 21 studies involving 10 764 patients were included in the final analysis. With the ERAS protocol, the length of hospitalization (MD: −1.02, 95% CI: −1.41 to −0.64, P<0.00001), hospitalization costs (MD: −678.50, 95% CI: −1196.39 to −160.60, P=0.01), and the incidence of 30-day readmission (odds ratio =0.78, 95% CI: 0.63–0.97, P=0.02) were significantly reduced. The incidences of overall complications, major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥3), postoperative nausea and vomiting, intra-abdominal bleeding, anastomotic leak, incisional infection, reoperation, and mortality did not differ significantly between the ERAS and SC groups. Conclusions: The current meta-analysis indicated that the ERAS protocol could be safely and feasibly implemented in the perioperative management of patients receiving minimally invasive bariatric surgery. Compared with SC, this protocol leads to significantly shorter hospitalization lengths, lower 30-day readmission rate, and hospitalization costs. However, no differences were observed in postoperative complications and mortality.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

Reference58 articles.

1. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years;Afshin;N Engl J Med,2017

2. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes;Schauer;N Engl J Med,2017

3. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013;Angrisani;Obes Surg,2015

4. Comparison of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus surgical sleeve gastrectomy: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database analysis;Gudur;Gastrointest Endosc,2022

5. Comparing outcomes of laparoscopic versus open bariatric surgery;Weller;Ann Surg,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3