Impact of guideline recommendation for novel surgical procedures on surgeons’ decisions: a time series analysis of gastric cancer surgeries from a nationwide cohort study

Author:

Honda Michitaka12ORCID,Yasunaga Hideo3,Michihata Nobuaki4,Miyakawa Teppei12ORCID,Kumazawa Ryosuke5ORCID,Matsui Hiroki3,Imaizumi Takahiro6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima

2. Department of Surgery, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama

3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health

4. Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku

5. Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjuku City, Tokyo

6. Department of Advanced Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

Abstract

Background: Since two Japanese guidelines, for gastric cancer treatment and for minimally invasive surgery, were simultaneously revised in 2014, laparoscopic distal gastrectomy has been a standard procedure for clinical stage I gastric cancer. Materials and methods: We evaluated the impact of this revision on surgeons’ decision-making using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. We described the time trends in the proportion of laparoscopic surgery from January 2011 to December 2018. We performed an interrupted time series analysis; the exposure time point was August 2014, and the main outcome was the change in slope before and after the revision of the guidelines. We performed a subgroup analysis of hospital volume and the odds ratio (OR) for postoperative complications according to exposure. Results: A total of 64 910 patients who underwent subtotal gastrectomy for stage I disease were identified. During the study period, the proportion of laparoscopic surgery showed a consistent increase from 47.4 to 81.2%. After the revision, the slope of the increase was rather slow; the OR [95% CI] was 0.601 [0.548–0.654] before the revision and 0.219 [0.176–0.260] after the revision. The adjusted ORs were 0.642 [0.575–0.709] before the revision and 0.240 [0.187–0.294] after the revision. Conclusion: The revision of the guidelines recommending laparoscopic surgery had little impact on surgeons’ decisions regarding the choice of procedure.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3