Responsiveness of Critically Ill Adults With Multimorbidity to Rehabilitation Interventions: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis Using Individual Pooled Data From Four Randomized Trials*

Author:

Jones Jennifer R. A.123,Karahalios Amalia4,Puthucheary Zudin A.56,Berry Michael J.7,Files D. Clark89,Griffith David M.1011,McDonald Luke A.2,Morris Peter E.12,Moss Marc13,Nordon-Craft Amy14,Walsh Timothy101516,Berney Sue12,Denehy Linda11718

Affiliation:

1. Physiotherapy Department, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

2. Physiotherapy Department, Division of Allied Health, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

3. Institute of Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

4. Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

5. William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, England, United Kingdom.

6. Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, England, United Kingdom.

7. Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC.

8. Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Immunologic Disease, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.

9. Wake Forest Critical Illness Injury and Recovery Research Center, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC.

10. Deanery of Molecular, Genetic and Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

11. Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS (National Health Service) Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.

12. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

13. Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

14. Physical Therapy Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

15. Anaesthetics, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.

16. Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.

17. Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

18. Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore if patient characteristics (pre-existing comorbidity, age, sex, and illness severity) modify the effect of physical rehabilitation (intervention vs control) for the coprimary outcomes health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and objective physical performance using pooled individual patient data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: Data of individual patients from four critical care physical rehabilitation RCTs. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible trials were identified from a published systematic review. DATA EXTRACTION: Data sharing agreements were executed permitting transfer of anonymized data of individual patients from four trials to form one large, combined dataset. The pooled trial data were analyzed with linear mixed models fitted with fixed effects for treatment group, time, and trial. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four trials contributed data resulting in a combined total of 810 patients (intervention n = 403, control n = 407). After receiving trial rehabilitation interventions, patients with two or more comorbidities had HRQoL scores that were significantly higher and exceeded the minimal important difference at 3 and 6 months compared with the similarly comorbid control group (based on the Physical Component Summary score (Wald test p = 0.041). Patients with one or no comorbidities who received intervention had no HRQoL outcome differences at 3 and 6 months when compared with similarly comorbid control patients. No patient characteristic modified the physical performance outcome in patients who received physical rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of a target group with two or more comorbidities who derived benefits from the trial interventions is an important finding and provides direction for future investigations into the effect of rehabilitation. The multimorbid post-ICU population may be a select population for future prospective investigations into the effect of physical rehabilitation.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3