Limiting Dynamic Driving Pressure in Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation*

Author:

Urner Martin,Jüni Peter,Rojas-Saunero L. Paloma1,Hansen Bettina23,Brochard Laurent J.456,Ferguson Niall D.4253,Fan Eddy42537

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

2. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

3. Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.

4. Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

5. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

6. Keenan Research Center, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

7. Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Abstract

Objectives: Previous studies reported an association between higher driving pressure (∆P) and increased mortality for different groups of mechanically ventilated patients. However, it remained unclear if sustained intervention on ∆P, in addition to traditional lung-protective ventilation, improves outcomes. We investigated if ventilation strategies limiting daily static or dynamic ∆P reduce mortality compared with usual care in adult patients requiring greater than or equal to 24 hours of mechanical ventilation. Design: For this comparative effectiveness study, we emulated pragmatic clinical trials using data from the Toronto Intensive Care Observational Registry recorded between April 2014 and August 2021. The per-protocol effect of the interventions was estimated using the parametric g-formula, a method that controls for baseline and time-varying confounding, as well as for competing events in the analysis of longitudinal exposures. Setting: Nine ICUs from seven University of Toronto-affiliated hospitals. Patients: Adult patients (≥18 yr) requiring greater than or equal to 24 hours of mechanical ventilation. Interventions: Receipt of a ventilation strategy that limited either daily static or dynamic ∆P less than or equal to 15 cm H2O compared with usual care. Measurements and Main Results: Among the 12,865 eligible patients, 4,468 of (35%) were ventilated with dynamic ∆P greater than 15 cm H2O at baseline. Mortality under usual care was 20.1% (95% CI, 19.4–20.9%). Limiting daily dynamic ∆P less than or equal to 15 cm H2O in addition to traditional lung-protective ventilation reduced adherence-adjusted mortality to 18.1% (95% CI, 17.5–18.9%) (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.89–0.92). In further analyses, this effect was most pronounced for early and sustained interventions. Static ∆P at baseline were recorded in only 2,473 patients but similar effects were observed. Conversely, strict interventions on tidal volumes or peak inspiratory pressures, irrespective of ∆P, did not reduce mortality compared with usual care. Conclusions: Limiting either static or dynamic ∆P can further reduce the mortality of patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3