Healthcare Professionals and Extreme Risk Protection Orders: A Concise Review

Author:

Lindley Lisa C.ORCID,Beebe Lora HumphreyORCID,Davis Heather A.ORCID,Policastro Christina N.ORCID,Svynarenko RadionORCID

Abstract

Background: Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) are one policy mechanism to address the critical public health problem of gun violence. The inclusion of healthcare professionals with ERPOs is a promising approach to expanding ERPO utilization, yet early evidence has not been examined. Objective: The purpose of this study was to synthesize the current research on healthcare professionals and ERPOs. Data Sources: Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Academic Search Complete, and Web of Science were searched. Study Selection: Studies examined healthcare professionals’ role and function within the context of ERPOs. Data Extraction: Relevant studies were reviewed and included through consensus of the authors. Data extracted included authors, objective, design, states, healthcare professional type, mental health professional type, healthcare professional roles/involvement and key outcomes. Data Synthesis: There is unfamiliarity with ERPOs among healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals lack ERPO knowledge and are unclear about ethical and legal ERPO liability. Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that healthcare professionals have an important role in ERPOs, but critical gaps in ERPO knowledge, training/resources, and liability will limit use and effectiveness of healthcare professionals, including nurses, in the role of ERPO petitioner.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference16 articles.

1. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework;Arksey;International Journal of Social Research Methodology,2005

2. Extreme risk protection orders in older adults in six U.S. states: A descriptive study;Betz;Clinical Gerontologist,2023

3. Nurses and gun violence prevention: Protecting the public’s health;Cogan;Nursing Economics,2023

4. Social workers’ perspectives on extreme risk protection orders;Conrick;Social Work,2023

5. Holistic approach to gun violence;Francis;The Journal of Holistic Nursing,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3