Birth Care Gaps in the CHildbirth Options, Information, and person-Centered Explanation (CHOICEs) Measure

Author:

Goh Amy H.,Robinson Keisha,Craddock Jaih B.,Breman Rachel Blankstein

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: The objective of this study was to revise and improve the intrapartum items of the shared decision-making (SDM) measure, CHildbirth Options, Information and person-Centered Explanation (CHOICEs). Study Design and Methods: Methodological sequential triangulation was used to select a purposive sample of 29 people who gave birth in the United States between August 2019 and June 2021. A qualitative descriptive approach was used to analyze and interpret the data. We used an interview guide with questions related to the nine intrapartum items in CHOICEs to address the question: How did decision-making occur during your most recent birth? Results: Four major themes were identified: provider told me what to do; communication about interventions during labor and birth; preferences overlooked; multiple team members. Under the theme of provider told me what to do, there was one sub-theme of induction of labor. Clinical Implications: Participants noted lack of shared decision-making, poor communication, and obstetric violence. We found the need for perinatal providers to improve communication with birthing people on topics such as fetal monitoring, induction of labor, and multiple team members who may participate in their care. Revisions of CHOICEs will include seven new items to further address birth preferences, feeling heard, and multiple team members.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference28 articles.

1. Listening to women: Recommendations from women of color to improve experiences in pregnancy and birth care;Altman;Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health,2020

2. Principles, scope, and limitations of the methodological triangulation;Arias Valencia;Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria,2022

3. Declined care and discrimination during the childbirth hospitalization;Attanasio;Social Science and Medicine,2019

4. Reliability and validity of a perinatal shared decision-making measure: The childbirth options, information, and person-centered explanation;Breman;Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing,2022

5. Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research;Colorafi;HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3