“Spot” ECGs Underestimate Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Surgical Ablation

Author:

Puskas John D.1,Corvera Joel S.2,Neill Alexis3,Kilgo Patrick1,Vassiliades Thomas1,Guyton Robert A.1

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Research Unit, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery

2. Joseph B. Whitehead Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine

3. Emory Atrial Fibrillation Center, Atlanta, Georgia.

Abstract

Objective Historically, success of surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been measured by electrocardiograms (ECGs) at various intervals. However, continuous monitoring of cardiac rhythms by “autocapture” devices has recently become more available and convenient. The concordance of measurements of freedom from AF by these two techniques has not been reported after surgical ablation. Methods Between August 2005 and May 2006, 47 patients at a single academic center underwent surgical ablation procedures for AF and had recurrence of AF assessed by both “spot” 12-lead ECG and autocapture event monitoring. Forty-one ablation procedures were concomitant with other cardiac surgery and six were stand alone, nonsternotomy procedures. Agreement between these diagnostic modes was measured using the κ statistic at 3, 6, and 12 months (κ of 1 is perfect agreement, 0 is no agreement). McNemar test was employed to determine whether agreement significantly changed from 3 to 12 months. Results At 3 months follow-up, spot ECGs suggested that 81% (38 of 47) of surgical patients were free of any AF, whereas 1-week event recordings found only 70% (31 of 44) of patients were free of any AF. At 6 months, spot ECGs estimated that 87% (40 of 46) of surgical patients were free of AF; 1-week event recordings found only 74% (34 of 46) of patients were free of AF. At 12 months, spot ECGs estimated that 84% (26 of 31) of surgical patients were free of AF compared with only 68% (19 of 28) as measured by the 1-week event recorder. The κ measures (with 95% confidence interval) at 3, 6, and 12 months were 0.52 (0.24–0.80), 0.60 (0.32–0.87), and 0.63 (0.32–0.94) respectively, showing only moderate agreement. McNemar test showed no significant shift in agreement from 3 to 6 months (P = 0.7055), 3 to 12 months (P = 1.000), or 6 to 12 months (P = 1.000). There were no deaths or strokes, but one myocardial infarction among these 47 patients during 12 months follow-up. Conclusions “Spot” ECGs underestimate the incidence of recurrent AF after surgical ablation for AF and show poor agreement with the more reliable 1-week autocapture event recordings.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3