Variability in Intraoperative Opioid and Nonopioid Utilization During Intracranial Surgery: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study

Author:

Naik Bhiken I.1,Lele Abhijit V.2,Sharma Deepak2,Akkermans Annemarie3,Vlisides Phillip E.4,Colquhoun Douglas A.4,Domino Karen B.2,Tsang Siny1,Sun Eric5,Dunn Lauren K.1,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

2. Department of Anesthesiology University of Washington, WA

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands

4. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, MI

5. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, CA

Abstract

Background: Key goals during intracranial surgery are to facilitate rapid emergence and extubation for early neurologic evaluation. Longer-acting opioids are often avoided or administered at subtherapeutic doses due to their perceived risk of sedation and delayed emergence. However, inadequate analgesia and increased postoperative pain are common after intracranial surgery. In this multicenter study, we describe variability in opioid and nonopioid administration patterns in patients undergoing intracranial surgery. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study using the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group database. Opioid and nonopioid practice patterns in 31,217 cases undergoing intracranial surgery across 11 institutions in the United States are described. Results: Across all 11 institutions, total median [interquartile range] oral morphine equivalents, normalized to weight and anesthesia duration was 0.17 (0.08 to 0.3) mg.kg.min-1. There was a 7-fold difference in oral morphine equivalents between the lowest (0.05 [0.02 to 0.13] mg.kg.min-1) and highest (0.36 [0.18 to 0.54] mg.kg.min-1) prescribing institutions. Patients undergoing supratentorial surgery had higher normalized oral morphine equivalents compared with those having infratentorial surgery [0.17 [0.08-0.31] vs. 0.15 [0.07-0.27] mg/kg/min-1; P<0.001); however, this difference is clinically small. Nonopioid analgesics were not administered in 20% to 96.8% of cases across institutions. Conclusion: This study found wide variability for both opioid and nonopioid utilization at an institutional level. Future work on practitioner-level opioid and nonopioid use and its impact on outcomes after intracranial surgery should be conducted.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference9 articles.

1. Prospective evaluation of pain and analgesic use following major elective intracranial surgery;Gottschalk;J Neurosurg,2007

2. Postoperative pain in neurosurgery: A pilot study in brain surgery;De Benedittis;Neurosurgery,1996

3. Pain in neurosurgically treated patients: A prospective observational study;Klimek;J Neurosurg,2006

4. Post-craniotomy pain management: Beyond opioids;Dunn;Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep,2016

5. A survey of post-craniotomy analgesia in British neurosurgical centres: Time for perceptions and prescribing to change?;Kotak;Br J Neurosurg,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3