Efficacy and Safety of Heparinase I  versus Protamine in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with and without Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Author:

Stafford-Smith Mark1,Lefrak Edward A.2,Qazi Anjum G.3,Welsby Ian J.4,Barber Linda5,Hoeft Andreas6,Dorenbaum Alejandro7,Mathias Jasmine8,Rochon James J.9,Newman Mark F.9,

Affiliation:

1. Associate Professor.

2. Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia.

3. Washington Adventist Hospital, Takoma Park, Maryland.

4. Assistant Professor.

5. Primary Study Coordinator.

6. Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

7. BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, California. §§ Members of the Global Perioperative Research Organization are listed in appendix 1.

8. Primary Study Biostatistician, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

9. Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Abstract

Background Hemodynamic protamine reactions with heparin reversal during cardiac surgery are common and associated with adverse outcomes. As an alternative to protamine, the authors examined heparinase I reversal of heparin after aortocoronary bypass graft surgery. Methods In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, 167 on- and off-pump aortocoronary bypass graft surgery patients received either heparinase I (maximum 35 microg/kg) or protamine (maximum 650 mg) for heparin reversal, monitored by activated clotting time values and clinical assessment. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded electronically; safety evaluation was to 30 days postoperatively. Noninferiority was predefined as 400 ml or less median 12-h chest tube drainage from intensive care unit arrival for heparinase I patients, after risk adjustment. Hemodynamic instability was defined as systemic hypotension (> or = 30 mmHg decrease) and/or pulmonary hypertension (> or = 40 mmHg with an increase > or = 10 mmHg) within 30 min of heparin reversal initiation. Results Patient enrollment was terminated on advisement of the Data Safety Monitoring Board. Although heparinase I was noninferior for 12-h chest tube drainage, protamine had a superior safety profile. Overall, heparinase I subjects had longer hospital stays (P = 0.04), were more likely to experience a serious adverse event (P = 0.01), and were less likely to avoid transfusion (P = 0.006). A composite morbidity score was not different (P = 0.24), and similar rates of hemodynamic instability were observed between groups. Findings were consistent in analyses stratified by on- and off-pump surgery. Conclusions Heparinase I reverses heparin anticoagulation after aortocoronary bypass graft surgery but is not equivalent to protamine because of its inferior safety profile.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference54 articles.

Cited by 49 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. What’s fishy about protamine? Clinical use, adverse reactions, and potential alternatives;Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis;2023-07

2. Production, characteristics and applications of microbial heparinases;Biochimie;2022-07

3. Cardiac Anesthesia;Manual of Perioperative Care in Adult Cardiac Surgery;2020-11-15

4. Protamine, is something fishy about it? The spectre of anaphylaxis continues;Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia;2019-02

5. Anticoagulant and side-effects of protamine in cardiac surgery: a narrative review;British Journal of Anaesthesia;2018-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3