Intermittent CPAP

Author:

Bratzke Edward,Downs John B.,Smith Robert A.

Abstract

Background Airway pressure-release ventilation provides ventilation comparable to controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), but with lower peak airway pressures and less dead-space ventilation. To obtain these advantages for patients administered general anesthesia, the authors (1) designed a mode similar to airway pressure-release ventilation, intermittent continuous positive airway pressure (CPAPI), and compared its efficiency with that of CMV; and (2) assessed the accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PETCO2) as a monitor of the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2) during CPAPI compared with during CMV. Methods Twenty anesthetized, tracheally intubated patients received baseline CMV that produced a PETCO2 of approximately 35 mmHg and a pulse oximetry value > 90%. Patients were assigned to undergo alternating trials of CMV and CPAPI. During CPAPI, CPAP was applied to the airway, removed for 1 s, and reapplied at a rate equal to the ventilator rate during CMV. The difference between the carbon dioxide tension in arterial blood and end-tidal gas [P(a-ET)CO2] and the calculation of PaCO2/minute ventilation quantified the efficiency of ventilation. Data were summarized as mean +/- SD and compared using the Student's t-test. Results Peak airway pressure (13+/-2 vs. 23+/-5 cm H2O; P < 0.001) and minute ventilation (3.5+/-1 vs. 4.6+/-1.2 l/min; P < 0.0001) were lower during CPAPI than during CMV. The value for PaCO2/minute ventilation (11.1+/-2.9 vs. 7.9+/-2.6 mmHg x l(-1) x min(-1); P < 0.0001) was greater during CPAPI. P(a-ET)CO2 was always greater during CMV (6.3+/-1.6 vs. 1.7+/-0.9 mmHg; P < 0.0001) and was never > 3.5 mmHg during CPAPI. Conclusions During CPAPI, less ventilation was necessary to produce a PaCO2 comparable to that during CMV. This represents a significant reduction in dead-space ventilation, improved efficiency of ventilation, and a lower value for P(a-ET)CO2. Compared with CMV, CPAPI also improves the accuracy of PETCO2 as a monitor of PaCO2.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference19 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3