Anesthesiologist Direction and Patient Outcomes

Author:

Silber Jeffrey H.1,Kennedy Sean K.2,Even-Shoshan Orit3,Chen Wei4,Koziol Laurie F.5,Showan Ann M.6,Longnecker David E.7

Affiliation:

1. Director, Center for Outcomes Research, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Associate Professor, Departments of Pediatrics and Anesthesia, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Department of Health Care Systems, The Wharton School and the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Original Investigations, The University of Pennsylvania.

2. Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesia, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.

3. Associate Director, Center for Outcomes Research, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

4. Director, Data Management and Computing, Center for Outcomes Research, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

5. Statistician, Center for Outcomes Research, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

6. Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesia, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.

7. Robert Dunning Dripps Professor and Chair, Department of Anesthesia, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.

Abstract

Background Anesthesia services for surgical procedures may or may not be personally performed or medically directed by anesthesiologists. This study compares the outcomes of surgical patients whose anesthesia care was personally performed or medically directed by an anesthesiologist with the outcomes of patients whose anesthesia care was not personally performed or medically directed by an anesthesiologist. Methods Cases were defined as being either "directed" or "undirected," depending on the type of involvement of the anesthesiologist, as determined by Health Care Financing Administration billing records. Outcome rates were adjusted to account for severity of disease and other provider characteristics using logistic regression models that included 64 patient and 42 procedure covariates, plus an additional 11 hospital characteristics often associated with quality of care. Medicare claims records were analyzed for all elderly patients in Pennsylvania who underwent general surgical or orthopedic procedures between 1991-1994. The study involved 194,430 directed and 23,010 undirected patients among 245 hospitals. Outcomes studied included death rate within 30 days of admission, in-hospital complication rate, and the failure-to-rescue rate (defined as the rate of death after complications). Results Adjusted odds ratios for death and failure-to-rescue were greater when care was not directed by anesthesiologists (odds ratio for death = 1.08, P < 0.04; odds ratio for failure-to-rescue = 1.10, P < 0.01), whereas complications were not increased (odds ratio for complication = 1.00, P < 0.79). This corresponds to 2.5 excess deaths/1,000 patients and 6.9 excess failures-to-rescue (deaths) per 1,000 patients with complications. Conclusions Both 30-day mortality rate and mortality rate after complications (failure-to-rescue) were lower when anesthesiologists directed anesthesia care. These results suggest that surgical outcomes in Medicare patients are associated with anesthesiologist direction, and may provide insight regarding potential approaches for improving surgical outcomes. (Key words: Anesthesiologists; anesthesia care team; quality of care; mortality; failure-to-rescue; complication; Medicare; general surgery; orthopedics.)

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference38 articles.

Cited by 146 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Designing safe procedural sedation: adopting a resilient culture;Handbook of Perioperative and Procedural Patient Safety;2024

2. Hospital characteristics associated with failure to rescue in cardiac surgery;JTCVS Open;2023-12

3. Response Letter;Anesthesia & Analgesia;2023-08-17

4. We Can Preserve Safety While Staffing Creatively;Anesthesia & Analgesia;2023-08-17

5. Healthcare policy changes in an era of health workforce shortage;Israel Journal of Health Policy Research;2023-08-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3