Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: Can the Risk of Entering the Spinal Canal Be Reduced?

Author:

Sardesai Anand M.1,Patel Roger2,Denny Nicholas M.3,Menon David K.4,Dixon Adrian K.5,Herrick Martin J.1,Harrop-Griffiths Alan W.6

Affiliation:

1. Consultant Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesia, Addenbrooke’s Hospital.

2. Clinical Fellow, Department of Radiology, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

3. Consultant Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesia, King’s Lynn, United Kingdom.

4. Professor of Anesthesia, University Department of Anesthesia, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

5. Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

6. Consultant Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesia, St. Mary’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Background Spinal cord damage during interscalene brachial plexus block has been attributed to needle entry into the spinal canal. The purpose of this study was to identify the angles and depths of needle insertion that increase the likelihood of such an event, using the traditional classic interscalene approach and two more proximal entry points. Method Magnetic resonance images of the neck from 10 healthy volunteers were used to obtain the three-dimensional spatial coordinates of three skin markers and the right-sided cervical nerves at the exiting neural foramina. The distance of the intervertebral foramina from the skin markers and the angles of the needle vector and the foramina were calculated. Results The distance from the skin to the intervertebral foramen may be as short as 2.5 cm with the classic approach. A caudal angulation greater than 50 degrees seemed to eliminate the risk of needle entry through the foramen. Conclusion With the classic approach to the interscalene block, there is a greater possibility of the needle passing through the intervertebral foramen if the needle is advanced too deeply. More proximal entry points and techniques that use a more steeply angled needle may reduce the risk of entry into the spinal space.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference17 articles.

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3