Relative Importance of Flow versus  Pressure in Splanchnic Perfusion during Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Rabbits

Author:

Bastien Olivier1,Piriou Vincent1,Aouifi Abdellah2,Flamens Claire1,Evans Rhys3,Lehot Jean Jacques4

Affiliation:

1. Praticien Hospitalier, Departement d’anesthesie Reanimatíon, Hôpital cardiologique et pneumologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.

2. Chief Resident in Anesthesia, Departement d’anesthesie Reanimatíon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Lyon, France.

3. Senior Clinical Lecturer, Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, United Kingdom.

4. Professor of Anesthesia, Departement d’anesthesie Reanimatíon, Université Claude Bernard, Hôpital cardiologique et pneumologique Louis Pradel, HCL, Lyon, France.

Abstract

Background Decreased gastrointestinal perfusion has been reported during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Conflicting results have been published concerning thresholds of pressure and flow to avoid splanchnic ischemia during CPB. This study compared splanchnic perfusion during independent and randomized variations of CPB pump flow or arterial pressure. Methods Ten rabbits were studied during mild hypothermic (36 degrees C) nonpulsatile CPB using neonatal oxygenators. Simultaneous measurements of tissue blood flow in four different splanchnic areas (gastric, jejunum, ileum, and liver) were performed by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) before CPB (T0) and during a 4-step factorial experimental block design. Pressure and flow were alternatively high or low in random order. Results Laser Doppler flowmetry was significantly lower than pre-CPB value but was better preserved (analysis of covariance) in all organs, except liver, when CPB flow was high, whatever the pressure. Splanchnic LDF values in the low- versus high-flow groups expressed as perfusion unit were (mean +/- SD): stomach, 94+/-66 versus 137+/-75; jejunum, 118+/-78 versus 172+/-75; ileum, 95+/-72 versus 146+/-83; and liver, 79+/-72 versus 108+/-118. No significant difference of LDF was observed between the high- and low-pressure groups, whatever the flow, except for liver: stomach, 115+/-64 versus 117+/-83; jejunum, 141+/-80 versus 148+/-83; ileum, 127+/-87 versus 114+/-76; liver, 114+/-88 versus 73+/-70. Conclusion Prevention of splanchnic ischemia during CPB should focus on preservation of high CPB blood flow rather than on high pressure.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference30 articles.

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3