Agreement with “The ethical guidelines on the provision and practice of advanced reproductive technology and intrauterine insemination 2023” by the Philippine Society of Reproductive Medicine using online Delphi technique

Author:

Aguilar Angela S.1,Novero Virgilio J.1,Ong-Jao Ednalyn T.2,Utulo Marijay3,Cortes-Gaspar Tawny A.P.4,Enriquez-Gamboa Michelle5,Carreon Genalyn6,Cheong Amanda7,Castillo-Carandang Nina T.8

Affiliation:

1. University of the Philippines College of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manila, Philippines

2. Manila Doctors Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manila, Philippines

3. Medical City Clark, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mabalacat- Pampanga, Philippines

4. Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila - Ospital ng Maynila, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manila, Philippines

5. Far Eastern University - Nicanor Reyes Medical Foundation, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Quezon, Philippines

6. Isabela United Doctors Medical Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cauayan- Isabela, Philippines

7. University of the Philippines Manila and the Philippine General Hospital, Neurosciences, Manila, Philippines

8. University of the Philippines College of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology, Manila, Philippines

Abstract

The ethical guidelines of the National Society of Certified Fertility Specialists, the Philippine Society for Reproductive Medicine, were reviewed 5 years after its publication to determine if there was a change in the views of the current members. The 2016 guideline document was converted into 75 Delphi statements, and the level of agreement with each statement was determined after 3 rounds. One hundred twenty-six members of the national society were invited to participate. Voting was conducted using an online Google form or using a self-administered printed questionnaire. The level of agreement with each statement was measured using a 5-point Likert scale. A panel discussion of speakers in theology, law, and medical ethics, as well as stakeholders represented by an infertility patient and from the LGBTQ community, was held before the last Delphi round. The response rate for the first Delphi round was 94%, and the second and third rounds were at 98%. A consensus was achieved in 66 of the 75 Delphi statements. Statements on preimplantation genetic testing, posthumous reproduction, cryopreservation, and third-party reproduction failed to achieve consensus.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3