Diagnostic accuracy of RBC scintigraphy and CTA for detection of patients with suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Sagar Sambit1,Kaushik Prateek1,Phulia Ankita2,Khan Dikhra1,Sarswat Sulochana1,Reddy K. Sreenivasa3,Kundu Nivedita1,Roy Arup1,V Rahul1,Y.S. Manikya1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, AIIMS,

2. Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi and

3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, AIIMS, Mangalagiri, India

Abstract

Objective Detection of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) through noninvasive modalities is very important in the successful management of LGIB. RBC scintigraphy and CT have a role in the detection of LGIB and guiding the management of patient by localization of the bleeding site. However, only a small number of studies have evaluated the role of RBC scintigraphy and CT in the diagnosis of LGIB. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of RBC scintigraphy and CT in the detection of LGIB in patients with clinical or biochemical findings suspicious of LGIB. Methods This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were conducted using relevant keywords, and articles published through 30 April 2022, were included. Using endoscopy or surgical outcomes as the reference standard, the numbers of true and false positives and true and false negatives were extracted. Pooled estimates of diagnostic test accuracy – including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and summary ROC (SROC) curve – were generated using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Results Three studies comprising 171 patients were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for the detection of LGIB using RBC scintigraphy were 0.787 (95% CI, 0.643–0.893), 0.289 (95% CI, 0.164–0.443), 1.214 (95% CI, 0.923–1.597) and 0.576 (95% CI, 0.296–1.121) respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.73. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for the detection of LGIB using CT were 0.931 (95% CI, 0.772–0.992), 0.870 (95% CI, 0.737–0.951), 6.085 (95% CI, 0.840–44.097), 0.126 (95% CI, 0.006–2.509) respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.095. Conclusion RBC scintigraphy has overall good sensitivity and CTA has excellent sensitivity specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio in the detection of LGIB in patients with clinical or biochemical findings suspicious for LGIB.CTA along with RBC scintigraphy can be used algorithmically to rule out patients who do not have a localization for the site of LGIB thereby helping these patients to avoid invasive procedures like endoscopy or surgical explorations.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Red cell transfusion for the management of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.;Jairath;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2010

2. Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.;Navuluri;Semin Intervent Radiol,2012

3. The SNMMI procedure standard/ EANM practice guideline for gastrointestinal bleeding scintigraphy 2.0.;Dam;J Nucl Med Technol,2014

4. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding: a practical guide for clinicians.;Kim;World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol,2014

5. The accuracy of technetium-99m-labeled red cell scintigraphy in localizing gastrointestinal bleeding.;Dusold;Am J Gastroenterol,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3