Affiliation:
1. Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Radiological Sciences,
2. Oncology Unit, Department of Surgery, A.R.N.A.S. Civico, Via Piazzale Leotta, Palermo and
3. Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale IRCCS, via Amendola, Reggio Emilia, Italy
Abstract
Aim
The early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) metastatic disease with PET imaging leads to stage migration and change of disease management. We aimed to assess the impact on clinical management deriving from prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging with a digital PET/CT during the routine application in the staging and restaging process of PCa.
Material and methods
Eighty consecutive PCa patients underwent 18F-PSMA-1007. Digital PET/CT were retrospectively evaluated and discussed with oncologists to evaluate the impact on clinical management. Performances analysis, correlation among variables also considering semiquantitative parameters have been conducted.
Results
In the whole group of 80 patients at staging (N = 31) and restaging (N = 49), the detection rate of PSMA PET was 85% for all lesions. At staging, the performance analysis resulted in sensitivity 77.6%, specificity 89.5%, negative predictive value (NPV) 77.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) 89.5%, accuracy 85.7%, and area under curve (AUC) 0.87%. The performance of restaging PET in the group of patients with PSA values <1 ng/ml resulted in the following values: sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 92.9%, NPV 85.7%, PPV 81.3%, accuracy 82.6%, and AUC 0.79. Semiquantitative analysis revealed a mean value of SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion PSMA expression with differences in patients with high risk compared to low intermediate. At restaging PET, semiquantitative values of patients with total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) ≤ 1 ng/ml were significantly less than those of the tPSA > 1 ng/ml. A significant impact on clinical management was reported in 46/80 patients (57.5%) based on PSMA PET findings at staging and restaging.
Conclusion
Although PSMA-PET provides optimal performances, its current role in redefining a better staging should be translated in the current clinical scenario about potential improvement in clinical/survival outcomes.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference34 articles.
1. Clinical variability and molecular heterogeneity in prostate cancer.;Shoag;Asian J Androl,2016
2. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent.;Mottet;Eur Urol,2021
3. Prostate cancer, version 4.2023, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.;Schaeffer;J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2023
4. Use of 18F-NaF PET in the staging of skeletal metastases of newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer patients: a nationwide cohort study.;Mogensen;BMJ Open,2022
5. The evolving role of prostate-specific membrane antigen-based diagnostics and therapeutics in prostate cancer.;Dorff;Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book,2019