[18F]-PSMA-1007 PET imaging optimization and inter-rater reliability – a comparison of three different reconstructions read by four radiologists

Abstract

Objectives To increase understanding of optimal imaging parameters [18F]PSMA-1007 when imaging patients with prostate cancer and to determine interrater agreement using [18F]PSMA-1007. Methods In this observational study, four independent physicians read reconstruction sets using bedtimes of 1, 2 and 3 minutes of patients undergoing [18F]PSMA-1007. positron emission topography. Clear and equivocal lesions and their locations were recorded. Image noise was rated on a four-point scale. Lesion counts were compared using inter-class correlation whereas noise ratings were compared using generalized estimating equations. Repeated cases were used to assess intra-rater agreement. Results Sixty reconstruction sets of 16 consecutively examined participants were included. Participants had a mean age of 71.5 years, six of them were examined prior to any treatment, three had a history of radiotherapy and seven of prostatectomy. Median Gleason score of primary tumors was 7. Imaging was performed after a mean of 132 min using a mean 3.95 MBq/Kg body weight of [18F] PSMA-1007. Neither the total number of lesions per location nor the proportion of equivocal lesions varied consistently between bedtimes. Inter-rater reliability scores varied depending on location from 0.40 to 1.0 and were similar for all bedtimes. Intra-rater reliability varied between 0.70 and 0.76 for the three different bedtimes. Noise ratings were significantly lower for 1 minute than 3 minutes per bed. Conclusion In the setting of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET CT, 1, 2 and 3 minutes per bed produce similar results unlikely to affect clinical interpretation. Image noise ratings favor 2 and 3 minutes per bed.