An Observational Study of Outcomes Associated With Virtual Pain Management Programs Based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Implemented During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Hollyfield Shakira1,Travers Warren1,Sondh Satwinder K.1,Wilczek Angelika1,Jacobs Clair1,McCracken Lance M.2,Scott Whitney13

Affiliation:

1. INPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust

2. Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

3. King’s College London, Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, UK

Abstract

Objective: In response to COVID-19, virtual, group-based interdisciplinary pain management programs (PMPs) were rapidly implemented. This included implementing different intensities and formats of virtual PMPs to address a range of patient needs and complexity. This observational study investigated outcomes associated with virtual high and low-intensity and pre-neuromodulation PMPs based on acceptance and commitment therapy as part of routine care during the pandemic. Methods: Depending on patients’ needs, participants completed a virtual high-intensity or low-intensity PMP, or a virtual PMP in preparation for neuromodulation, from June 2020 to June 2022. Participants completed standardized measures of pain intensity and interference, work and social adjustment, depression, and pain acceptance before and after treatment. Data from 2018 to 2019 for in-person residential (n=561), outpatient (n=123), and pre-neuromodulation (n=207) PMPs were also examined to provide a historical benchmark of performance. Results: The virtual high-intensity PMP (n=294) showed significant improvements in all variables, with small effects. There were significant improvements with small effects for pain interference, depression, and acceptance for the virtual pre-neuromodulation PMP (n=129). No statistically significant improvements were observed for the virtual low-intensity PMP (n=90). The improvements associated with prepandemic in-person PMPs were generally larger relative to the virtual PMPs of comparable intensity delivered during the pandemic. Discussion: These data provide preliminary support for the potential benefits of high, but not low, intensity virtual acceptance and commitment therapy-based PMPs, including in the context of neuromodulation. Research is needed to maximize the impact of virtual PMPs and match patients with the most appropriate delivery format.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3