A Novel Movement-Evoked Pain Provocation Test for Older Adults With Persistent Low Back Pain

Author:

Simon Corey B.1,Hicks Gregory E.2,Pieper Carl F.3,Byers Kraus Virginia45,Keefe Francis J.6,Colón-Emeric Cathleen47

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery

2. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE

3. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics

4. Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine

5. Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine

6. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University

7. Durham VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham, NC

Abstract

Objectives: Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent and disabling for older adults. Movement-evoked pain is an emerging measure that may help to predict disability; but is not currently a part of geriatric LBP clinical care. This study tested the safety and feasibility of a new Movement-Evoked Provocation Test for Low Back Pain in Older Adults (MEPLO). We also compared associations between movement-evoked pain via 2 different scoring methods and disability-associated outcomes. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine older adults with persistent LBP provided baseline recalled and resting pain ratings, self-reported physical function, and usual gait speed. Participants then completed MEPLO, involving 4 tasks essential for functional independence: chair rises, trunk rotation, reaching, and walking. Movement-evoked pain was then quantified using the traditional change score (delta) method of pain premovement to postmovement; and also, a new aggregate method that combines pain ratings after the 4 tasks. Results: No safety or feasibility issues were identified. Compared with the delta score, the aggregate score was more strongly associated with self-reported physical function (beta: −0.495 vs. −0.090) and usual gait speed (beta: −0.450 vs. −0.053). Similarly, the aggregate score was more strongly associated with self-reported physical function than recalled and resting pain (beta: −0.470, −0.283, and 0.136, respectively). Discussion: This study shows the safety and feasibility of testing movement-evoked pain in older adults with persistent LBP, and its potential superiority to traditional pain measures. Future studies must validate these findings and test the extent to which MEPLO is implementable to change with geriatric LBP standard of care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3