Application of the IASP Grading System to Identify Underlying Pain Mechanisms in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Author:

Vervullens Sophie123,Meert Lotte123,Meeus Mira13,Heusdens Christiaan H.W.45,Verdonk Peter67,Foubert Anthe138,Abatih Emmanuel9,Durnez Lies1,Verbrugghe Jonas110,Smeets Rob J.E.M.2310

Affiliation:

1. Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium

2. Research School CAPHRI, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

3. Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), Antwerp, Belgium

4. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp

5. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk

6. ORTHOCA, Antwerp, Belgium

7. ASTARC Department, Antwerp University, Antwerp

8. Faculté des Sciences de la Motricité, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve

9. DASS (Center for Data Analysis and Statistical Science), Ghent University, Krijgslaan, Gent

10. REVAL-Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to apply the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) grading system for identifying nociplastic pain in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and propose criteria to fine-tune decision-making. In addition, the study aimed to characterize a “probable” versus “no or possible” nociplastic pain mechanism using biopsychosocial variables and compare both groups in their 1-year post-TKA response. Methods: A secondary analysis of baseline data of a longitudinal prospective study involving 197 patients with KOA awaiting total TKA in Belgium and the Netherlands was performed. Two approaches, one considering 4 and the other 3 pain locations (step 2 of the grading system), were presented. Linear mixed model analyses were performed to compare the probable and no or possible nociplastic pain mechanism groups for several preoperative biopsychosocial-related variables and 1-year postoperative pain. Also, a sensitivity analysis, comparing 3 pain mechanism groups, was performed. Results: Thirty (15.22%—approach 4 pain locations) and 46 (23.35%–approach 3 pain locations) participants were categorized under probable nociplastic pain. Irrespective of the pain location approach or sensitivity analysis, the probable nociplastic pain group included more woman, was younger, exhibited worse results on various preoperative pain-related and psychological variables, and had more pain 1-year post-TKA compared with the other group. Discussion: This study proposed additional criteria to fine-tune the grading system for nociplastic pain (except for discrete/regional/multifocal/widespread pain) and characterized a subgroup of patients with KOA with probable nociplastic pain. Future research is warranted for further validation.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference67 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3