Colorectal cancer screening status and its association with health belief model variables in a rural population

Author:

Bateman Andre G.1,Greeson Emily M.2ORCID,Lowenstein Kathleen3,Rodriguez Michael G.4,Lyons James A.4,Stack Matthew A.4,O'Rourke Michael3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

2. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

3. Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

4. Michigan State University/ My Michigan Medical Center Gratiot—Family Medicine Residency Program, Alma, MI

Abstract

Abstract Background: Rural populations exhibit low colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates, which may be a consequence of social determinants of health but may also result from individual health beliefs. This study aimed to explore the association between key health belief model (HBM) variables and CRC screening status in a rural Midwest population. Methods: One hundred thirty six people participated in this cross-sectional study. A survey instrument was developed to capture demographic information and measure the following HBM variables: perceived barriers, perceived benefits, self-efficacy beliefs associated with CRC screening, and knowledge associated with CRC. Results: The response rate for the study was 17.6%. The most endorsed (28.5%) barrier to CRC screening was fear of something going wrong. The most endorsed (86.5%) benefit of CRC screening was confidence that privacy and confidentiality would be protected. There were significant differences (P < .01) in means for perception of barriers, benefits, and self-efficacy according to CRC screening status. In a model which included perception of barriers, benefits, and self-efficacy, only perceived barriers made a unique, significant (P < .05) contribution (OR = 0.823 [0.706–0.958]) in predicting CRC screening status. Conclusions: Key HBM variables, perception of barriers, benefits, and self-efficacy seem to be important factors associated with CRC screening in rural populations and may be appropriate targets for interventions to increase CRC screening.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Community and Home Care

Reference29 articles.

1. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening: does rurality play a role?;Ojinnaka;J Rural Health.,2015

2. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020;Siegel;CA Cancer J Clin.,2020

3. Barriers of colorectal cancer screening in rural USA: a systematic review;Wang;Rural Remote Health.,2019

4. Rural–urban differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers in Nebraska;Hughes;J Community Health.,2015

5. Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population;Seeff;Cancer.,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3