Adding “Unlikely” as a Clinical Qualifier Is Unlikely to Be of Help: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Cross-Sectional Cohort Study

Abstract

Abstract: Clinical correlation is essential to accurate and efficient diagnosis and differential diagnosis in dermatopathology. Poor-quality clinical information can lead to failures and delays in patient care. Some clinicians use the term “unlikely” when submitting a specimen. How frequently the “unlikely” clinical diagnosis correlates with the final pathologic diagnosis is unknown. We studied 203 dermatopathology reports from December 8, 2020, to July 1, 2021, that included the qualifier “unlikely” on the requisition sheet. Samples were stratified into either an inflammatory or neoplastic cohort based on final histopathologic diagnosis, with the neoplastic cohort being further stratified into pigmented and nonpigmented cohorts. Statistical analyses were conducted. The “unlikely” diagnosis in the clinical differential diagnosis and the final histologic diagnosis were the same in 7.9% of the 203 samples studied. This occurred in 8.5% of the inflammatory cohort and 7.6% of the neoplastic cohort. We concluded that the use of the qualifier “unlikely” is not helpful. We acknowledge the limitations of our study because of a small sample.