Comparison of Digital Pathology and Light Microscopy Among Dermatology Residents: A Reappraisal Following Practice Changes

Abstract

Background: Following transition to digital pathology for primary diagnosis at our institution, dermatology residents have reduced exposure to light microscopy. This study compares resident competency with light microscopy versus digital pathology following practice changes. Methods: Twenty-one dermatology residents were administered a dermatopathology examination composed of 32 diagnoses evaluated using digital slides and 32 with light microscopy. Case difficulty was graded and balanced between modalities. Diagnostic accuracy was measured using the number of correct diagnoses for each modality. Participants were surveyed regarding their experience and preferences. Results: Diagnostic accuracy was higher with digital pathology than light microscopy (22/32 vs. 18/32, P < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy with digital pathology increased with years of training, but accuracy with light microscopy did not. Residents with previous light microscopy experience achieved an average score of 19/32 on glass, as compared with 10/32 for those without experience (P = 0.039). Digital pathology was preferred over light microscopy (18/21, 85.7%). Conclusions: Trainees had better diagnostic proficiency with digital pathology and preferred this modality. Most practices at this time continue to use light microscopy. Therefore, we need to maintain proficiency in microscopy during training while concurrently preparing trainees for a digital future.