Prospective Randomized Study on the Use of Sentinel Node Biopsy for High-risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck

Author:

Spyropoulou Georgia-Alexandra1,Mpalaris Vassilis2,Pervana Stavroula3,Trakatelli Myrto4,Foroglou Periklis1,Milothridis Panagiotis5,Garoufalias Theodoros1,Drougou Avra1,Demiri Efterpi1

Affiliation:

1. Clinic of Plastic Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

2. 3rd University Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

3. Pathology Department, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

4. 2nd Dermatology Clinic, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

5. Private Practice, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Abstract

Background: The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is not yet clearly documented, especially for the head and neck area, due to its rich and cross-branching lymphatic system. We present the first prospective randomized study on the use of SLNB in high-risk CSCCs of the head and neck. Methods: Seventy-six patients with high-risk CSCCs of the head and neck were randomly divided into two groups: A (n = 38) and B (n = 38). In group A, SLNB was performed additionally to the excision of squamous cell carcinoma, whereas in group B, only excision of the lesion was performed. The patients were followed up for 5 years postoperatively, and local recurrences, regional metastases (regional lymph nodes), and mortality were documented. Results: One patient of group A, who never attended any follow-up, was excluded. Both groups had similar characteristics regarding Breslow thickness, perineurial invasion, peripheral limits, differentiation, size, previous incomplete excision, age, sex, education, sun exposure, Fitzpatrick score, previous incomplete excision, previous skin cancer, and smoking. Two patients had a positive sentinel lymph node and were submitted to regional lymphadenectomy. We documented deaths (three in group A and two in group B; P = 0.674), local recurrence (seven in group A and six in group B; P = 0.768), and regional metastasis (zero in group A and two in group B; P = 0.159). Conclusion: There is no clear benefit on the use of SLNB in high-risk CSCCs of the head and neck regarding metastasis, mortality, or local recurrence control.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3