Neither Antiplatelet nor Anticoagulant Therapy Increases Graft Failure after Split-thickness Skin Grafting

Abstract

Background: Split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) are an effective modality for lower extremity wound coverage. Many patients in the highly comorbid chronic wound population present with cardiovascular disease requiring chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, theoretically increasing risk for bleeding complications, donor site morbidity, and poor graft take. Some surgeons advocate temporary cessation of antithrombotic therapy, which may increase cardiovascular risk. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of anticoagulation use on STSG outcomes. Methods: All patients receiving STSGs for lower extremity wounds from 2014 to 2016 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Successful grafts were defined as greater than 99.5% wound coverage. Patients were divided into two groups: anticoagulation/antiplatelet or no anticoagulation/antiplatelet. Continuous variables were described by means and SDs and analyzed using student’s t-test. Categorical variables were described by frequencies and percentages and analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher exact tests as appropriate. Results: In total, 231 wounds were identified among 189 patients; 124 patients were receiving at least one antiplatelet/anticoagulant at time of grafting. Three hematomas were reported during 30 days of follow-up; there was no significant difference between groups (P > 0.05). Anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy in the perioperative period had no significant impact on STSG take and overall healing. Conclusions: The findings from this study demonstrate that administration of anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents in the perioperative period does not increase the risk of skin graft failure. Based on these findings, STSG can be performed without cessation of anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy.