Should Acellular Dermal Matrices Be Used for Implant-based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy? Clinical Recommendation Based on the GRADE Approach

Author:

Cinquini Michela1,Rocco Nicola23,Catanuto Giuseppe24,Garreffa Emanuele5,Ferrando Pietro Maria6,Gonzalez-Lorenzo Marien1,Maglia Anna7,Montagna Giacomo8,Villanucci Amedeo9,Visintini Cividin Valentina10,Nava Maurizio Bruno2,

Affiliation:

1. Unit of Systematic Reviews Methodology and Guidelines Production, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy

2. G.RE.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements, Naples, Catania, Italy

3. Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

4. Multidisciplinary Breast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro, Catania, Italy

5. Breast Surgery, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK

6. Plastic Surgery, Città della salute e della Scienza di Torino, CTO Hospital, Turin, Italy

7. Clinical Data Coordinator, Medpace, Leuven, Belgium

8. Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y.

9. Breast Surgery Department, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Territorial Area of Prato, Italy

10. Plastic Surgery Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Pordenone, Italy.

Abstract

Background: Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) entered the market in the early 2000s and their use has increased thereafter. Several retrospective cohort studies and single surgeon series reported benefits with the use of ADMs. However, robust evidence supporting these advantages is lacking. There is the need to define the role for ADMs in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) after mastectomy. Methods: A panel of world-renowned breast specialists was convened to evaluate evidence, express personal viewpoints, and establish recommendation for the use of ADMs for subpectoral one-/two-stage IBBR (compared with no ADM use) for adult women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment or risk reduction using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Based on the voting outcome, the following recommendation emerged as a consensus statement: the panel members suggest subpectoral one- or two-stage IBBR either with ADMs or without ADMs for adult women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment or risk reduction (with very low certainty of evidence). Conclusions: The systematic review has revealed a very low certainty of evidence for most of the important outcomes in ADM-assisted IBBR and the absence of standard tools for evaluating clinical outcomes. Forty-five percent of panel members expressed a conditional recommendation either in favor of or against the use of ADMs in subpectoral one- or two-stages IBBR for adult women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment or risk reduction. Future subgroup analyses could help identify relevant clinical and pathological factors to select patients for whom one technique could be preferable to another.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. New perspectives in breast reconstruction;Annals of Breast Surgery;2024-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3