Patients Prefer Ultrasound to Nerve Conduction Studies for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract

Background: The net promoter score (NPS) allows analysis of patient satisfaction and preference between treatment and/or diagnostic testing. Electrodiagnostic testing (EDX) and ultrasound (US) are commonly used diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome. Although EDX is reliable for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), it can be uncomfortable and inconvenient for patients. We aimed to determine whether patients preferred US or EDX studies for the diagnosis of CTS, using the NPS. Methods: Seventy-five patients presenting to the clinic for evaluation of CTS complaints who had EDX were prospectively studied. US evaluation of the median nerve was then completed at time of evaluation. Patient satisfaction was determined by asking, “how likely are you to recommend this procedure to a friend or relative?” for both EDX and US. Patient demographics, comorbidities, CTS-6 questionnaire (CTS-6), and functionality assessed through patient-reported qDASH were also recorded. Results: Sixty-five patients were included in the study. Most patients did not have any comorbidities and were nonsmokers. The gender composition was similar, and the average age of the enrolled patients was 58. The NPS for US was significantly higher than EDX (P < 0.0001). Patients with diabetes mellitus rated their EDX experience significantly lower than those without diabetes mellitus. Conclusions: Patients are more likely to recommend US instead of EDX in the evaluation of CTS complaints. This allows for shared decision-making between the patient and provider if ordering diagnostic testing for CTS.