Alveolar Oral Layer Repair by Periosteal Grafts versus Maxillary Flaps and Gingivoperiosteoplasty: Techniques and Follow-up to Adolescence

Author:

El Danaf Ahmed A.1,Al-Ahmady Hatem H.2,Eldanaf Heba A.3,Soliman Helmy A.1,Elhelw Moustafa H.1,Khalil Maurice F.1,Rizk Ibrahim A.1,Donia Mohamed S.1

Affiliation:

1. Plastic Surgery Department, Al Mataria Teaching Hospital, GOTHI, Cairo, Egypt

2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Girls’ Branch, Al Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

3. Restorative and Dental Materials Department, Oral and Dental Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Cairo, Egypt.

Abstract

Background: Alveolar periosteoplasty during primary repair of cleft lip is still a topic of debate due to the fear exacerbating maxillary retrusion. The authors present their experience with early closure of alveolar clefts. The study aims to analyze gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) by comparing the use of locoregional flaps versus distant grafts for reconstruction of the lower layer of the primary palate cleft. Methods: Seventeen infants underwent 22 alveolar cleft repairs. After nasal floor repair by nasal mucoperiosteum, the oral layer was repaired by maxillary or gingival periosteal flaps in seven patients with alveolar clefts less than or equal to 6 mm wide, and tibial or pericranial periosteal grafts in 10 patients with wider clefts. At teenage years, crossbites in three flap-GPP and three graft-GPP patients were compared with nine older adolescents without primary GPP. Results: Alveolar clefts were perfectly sealed. Radiographs during the early 3 postoperative years showed new bone formation more posteriorly extended in patients who underwent graft-GPP. Teeth eruption and alveolar rigidity at the mixed dentition age eliminated the need for secondary bone grafting. The anterior crossbites in adolescent patients ranged between −2 and −14 mm; crossing was relatively smaller in patients with a younger age and without cleft palate. The mean crossbite was 7.2 mm in the six teenagers and 9.6 mm in the control cases. Conclusions: Graft-GPP may be a good alternative to flap-GPP, particularly for wide alveolar cleft repair. Maxillary retrusion is aggravated in patients with cleft palate and older age at assessment. GPP may not increase crossbite.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference35 articles.

1. The use of periosteal flaps in the repair of clefts of the primary palate.;Skoog;Cleft Palate J,1965

2. Reconstruction of cleft maxilla with periosteoplasty.;Massei;Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg,1986

3. The use of free periosteum for bone formation in congenital clefts of the maxilla.;Ritsila;Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg,1972

4. Periosteal graft in the repair of complete primary cleft palate [French].;Stricker;Ann Chir Plast,1977

5. Cleft lip and palate treated by presurgical orthopedics, gingivoperiosteoplasty, and lip adhesion (POPLA) compared with previous lip adhesion method: a preliminary study of serial dental casts.;Millard;Plast Reconstr Surg,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3