BODY-Q Normative Scores: Psychometric Validation of the BODY-Q in the General Population in Europe and North America

Author:

Dalaei Farima123,de Vries Claire E.E.45,Cano Stefan J.6,Kaur Manraj N.7,Poulsen Lotte12,Pfob André8,Mou Danny9,Repo Jussi P.10,Salzillo Rosa11,Opyrchal Jakub12,Sørensen Jens A.12,Pusic Andrea L.13,Klassen Anne F.14

Affiliation:

1. Research Unit of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark

2. University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

3. OPEN, Odense Explorative Patient Network, Odense, Denmark

4. Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

5. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Mass.

6. Modus Outcomes Ltd, Cheltenham, United Kingdom

7. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

8. University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

9. Department of General Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Mass.

10. Unit of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

11. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy

12. Department of Oncologic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial National Cancer Center, Gliwice, Poland

13. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

14. Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Background: BODY-Q is a rigorously developed patient-reported outcome measure designed to measure outcomes of weight loss and body contouring patients. To allow interpretation and comparison of BODY-Q scores across studies, normative BODY-Q values were generated from the general population. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of BODY-Q in the normative population. Methods: Data were collected using two crowdsourcing platforms (Prolific and Amazon Mechanical Turk) in 12 European and North American countries. Rasch measurement theory (RMT) was used to examine reliability and validity of BODY-Q scales. Results: RMT analysis supported the psychometric properties of BODY-Q in the normative sample with ordered thresholds in all items and nonsignificant chi-square values for 167 of 176 items. Reliability was high with person separation index of greater than or equal to 0.70 in 20 of 22 scales and Cronbach alpha values of greater than or equal to 0.90 in 17 of 22 scales. Mean scale scores measuring appearance, health-related quality of life, and eating-related concerns scales varied as predicted across subgroups with higher scores reported by participants who were more satisfied with their weight. Analysis to explore differential item functioning by sample (normative versus field-test) flagged some potential issues, but subsequent comparison of adjusted and unadjusted person estimates provided evidence that the scoring algorithm worked equivalently for the normative sample as in the field-test samples. Conclusions: The BODY-Q scales showed acceptable reliability and validity in the normative sample. The normative values can be used as reference in research and clinical practice in combination with local estimates for parallel analysis and comparison.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3